“Know your number before the market does.”
Editor's note
Enter your job title and what you actually do each day. The analyzer scores how much of your work is automatable within 5 years, breaks the risk down task by task, names the human strengths AI can’t match in your role, and gives you concrete moves to stay ahead.
Tagged
§ Section I
The title alone isn't enough — two people with the same title can face very different risk. List your main activities and roughly how much of your week each takes: meetings, writing, analysis, hands-on work, client relationships.
Industry and experience level shift the assessment: the same tasks carry different risk in healthcare vs. e-commerce, and senior roles usually shift toward judgment and oversight work that automates more slowly.
You get a 0-100 risk score, a task-by-task breakdown showing exactly which parts of your work are exposed, the human advantages you should lean into, and concrete moves with timeframes — usually starting with using AI yourself before it's used around you.
§ Section II
Get an honest read on how your role evolves over the next 5 years and which skills to build now — so the change happens with you rather than to you.
Before retraining into a new field, check its automation exposure. Some "safe" sounding careers are heavily exposed; some hands-on roles are far more durable than headlines suggest.
Stress-test a career path before investing years in it. The task-level breakdown shows which parts of a profession have staying power and which are already being absorbed by AI tools.
Run assessments for the roles on your team to see where AI tooling will land first, which skills to develop, and how to redesign roles around the durable human work.
§ Section III
The analyzer breaks your described work into distinct tasks, scores each against what current and near-term AI systems demonstrably do well, and weights by how much of your week each task consumes. It's an evidence-based estimate of task exposure over 5 years — not a prophecy about your specific employer.
No. High task exposure usually means the job changes before it disappears: the automatable parts get faster and cheaper, and the role consolidates around the parts AI can't do. People who adopt the tools early typically absorb the change; the risk concentrates on those who don't.
Neither, by design. The system is instructed to be honest in both directions: if your work is highly exposed it says so and focuses on the transition path; if your work is genuinely hard to automate it explains why instead of inventing alarm.
It's deliberately the cheapest tool on the platform — your 10 free signup credits cover ten assessments. Check your own job, then the roles you're considering moving into.
Yes — describe the typical day-to-day of the target role as best you know it. Comparing the risk profile of your current job against a prospective one is one of the most useful ways to use the tool.